Skip to content

Submit plan to get meter-speed going again. - #1968

Merged
mscuthbert merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
meter-reapply-memory
Aug 20, 2026
Merged

Submit plan to get meter-speed going again.#1968
mscuthbert merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
meter-reapply-memory

Conversation

@mscuthbert

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

meter-speed is 879 commits stale and according to Claude has 39 deep semantic conflicts (str->tuple + immutable rewrite vs master's evolved string/mutable code).

Abandon the merge and re-apply FrozenDuration + immutable MeterTerminal/MeterSequence + tuple NumDenom fresh on master instead.

Claude put in the memory -- committing temporarily to be able to work with it on a new branch.

AI-assisted (Claude)

meter-speed is 879 commits stale; merging master produced 39 deep semantic
conflicts (str->tuple + immutable rewrite vs master's evolved string/mutable
code). Decided to abandon the merge and re-apply FrozenDuration + immutable
MeterTerminal/MeterSequence + tuple NumDenom fresh on master instead.

AI-assisted (Claude)
@coveralls

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Coverage Status

coverage: 93.297%. remained the same — meter-reapply-memory into master

@mscuthbert

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

note -- I doubt in the future I'll commit pure AI-memories as PRs -- was still learning so much oh 50 days ago.

@mscuthbert
mscuthbert merged commit e511ea4 into master Aug 20, 2026
7 checks passed
@mscuthbert
mscuthbert deleted the meter-reapply-memory branch August 20, 2026 01:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants